lighttpd forum XCache > Xcache configuration?

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4760/96438323yj3.jpg

wondering if i have the best configuration? i have xcache_optimizer 
enabled

http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/7589/81312772ju2.jpg

I got 1 x E5405
4 gb ram

John wrote:
> http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4760/96438323yj3.jpg
> 
> wondering if i have the best configuration? i have xcache_optimizer 
> enabled
> 
> http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/7589/81312772ju2.jpg
> 
> I got 1 x E5405
> 4 gb ram


             total       used       free     shared    buffers 
cached
Mem:          3948       3914         34          0         30 
3441
-/+ buffers/cache:        442       3506
Swap:         4094         11       4083

heres a newer picture

http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/8994/28656202ar4.jpg

John wrote:
> heres a newer picture
> 
> http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/8994/28656202ar4.jpg


help?

looks good

moo XCache wrote:
> looks good

Shouldnt i do something about the oom? i got over 1700

> Shouldnt i do something about the oom? i got over 1700

u know the answer already, simply increase memory for it

moo XCache wrote:
>> Shouldnt i do something about the oom? i got over 1700
> 
> u know the answer already, simply increase memory for it

Actually i don't. Which one should i increase and how much?

John wrote:
> moo XCache wrote:
>>> Shouldnt i do something about the oom? i got over 1700
>> 
>> u know the answer already, simply increase memory for it
> 
> Actually i don't. Which one should i increase and how much?

in your case it is xcache.var_size, try double it

the rule is simple
for cache: just increase the size of cache that is OutOfMemory as much 
as possible, but you don't have infinite memory and other applications 
need memory to, so it's your job to balance memory resource usage.
once size does not fit all, so there's no "best" configuration for 
everyone, learn the rule and tune it yourself. you'll get what's "best" 
one for your own.

can someone look at this and tell me if he thinks it's normal or that i 
should change something (i don't use vars for now)

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3118/outputwd9.th.png

I'm running a dualcore processor and 2Go RAM
Thanks

Greg wrote:
> can someone look at this and tell me if he thinks it's normal or that i 
> should change something (i don't use vars for now)
> 
> http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3118/outputwd9.th.png
> 
> I'm running a dualcore processor and 2Go RAM
> Thanks

oops

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3118/outputwd9.png

http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=outputwd9.png

> http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3118/outputwd9.png
> 
> http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=outputwd9.png

looks good, the "var" is for application enabled and support XCache, 
like vBulletin

moo XCache wrote:
>> http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3118/outputwd9.png
>> 
>> http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=outputwd9.png
> 
> looks good, the "var" is for application enabled and support XCache, 
> like vBulletin

Thanks even so i guess better optimization could be. I was surprised 
seeing 4 slpits as i defined 3 xcache.count as i have a dual core 
processor but i guess it's the best i could do based on all what i read 
on forums.
Yes i'm not using vars yet as I haven't seen exactly for what to use

> Thanks even so i guess better optimization could be. I was surprised 
> seeing 4 slpits as i defined 3 xcache.count as i have a dual core 
no problem, it's forced to 2^n :)

Thanks even so i guess better optimization could be.
 I was surprised seeing 4 splits as i defined 3 x cache.
___________
timothycrew
"http://www.casualdate.net.au