lighttpd forum XCache > SHM with many FastCGI process

Posted by meto (Guest)
on 10.07.2008 11:15
Is it possible to force XCache to use one SHM block? I think it would be 
a nice feature, not like somebody mentioned to use memcached as backend. 
I've heard that's doable in APC - you have to give it full path in mmap 
(before compiling) instead of using random one.
Posted by moo XCache
on 11.07.2008 01:04
meto wrote:
> Is it possible to force XCache to use one SHM block? I think it would be 
not yet
> a nice feature, not like somebody mentioned to use memcached as backend. 
> I've heard that's doable in APC - you have to give it full path in mmap 
> (before compiling) instead of using random one.
i don't think it can. same applies to XCache
Posted by Maciek Wojcikowski
on 11.07.2008 06:39
moo XCache wrote:
> meto wrote:
>> Is it possible to force XCache to use one SHM block? I think it would be 
> not yet
In which version you plan to add that feature? I think it's the most 
important thing now for many people, therfore none of opcachers have 
that function built in.

>> a nice feature, not like somebody mentioned to use memcached as backend. 
>> I've heard that's doable in APC - you have to give it full path in mmap 
>> (before compiling) instead of using random one.
> i don't think it can. same applies to XCache
I've read about that in some APC ticket, but actualy havent testetd 
it...
Posted by moo XCache
on 12.07.2008 01:50
> In which version you plan to add that feature? I think it's the most 
> important thing now for many people, therfore none of opcachers have 
> that function built in.
2.0
Posted by Maciek Wojcikowski
on 12.07.2008 08:35
moo XCache wrote:
>> In which version you plan to add that feature? I think it's the most 
>> important thing now for many people, therfore none of opcachers have 
>> that function built in.
> 2.0

Is it in current svn version yet?
Posted by moo XCache
on 14.07.2008 01:07
> Is it in current svn version yet?

sorry, but no.
Posted by denis (Guest)
on 24.07.2008 10:41
meto wrote:
> Is it possible to force XCache to use one SHM block? I think it would be 
> a nice feature, not like somebody mentioned to use memcached as backend. 
> I've heard that's doable in APC - you have to give it full path in mmap 
> (before compiling) instead of using random one.

Meto, please paste link to this Apc thread. I can't find it.