It would be nice to see some performance comparison between eA, APC, ZendOptimizationSuite and xcache. Has anyone done some tests until now ?
on 13.05.2006 17:39
on 19.05.2006 05:01
Malte Geierhos wrote: > It would be nice to see some performance comparison between eA, APC, > ZendOptimizationSuite and xcache. > > Has anyone done some tests until now ? xcache is young online so not too much user using it, and it seems no one is doing the benchmark. but what i can tell u so far is: i have done some benchmark sometimes ago, most non-stupid-non-dirty opcode cacher, if it's really doing opcode cacher, can boost php speed up about 2 times faster, and their benchmark is almost equal, with minor --- something like 0.01 to 0.1 percent --- difference. and you can always see the official author claim their cacher is more faster than anyone's else.
on 02.06.2006 14:42
moo moo wrote: > Malte Geierhos wrote: >> It would be nice to see some performance comparison between eA, APC, >> ZendOptimizationSuite and xcache. >> >> Has anyone done some tests until now ? > > xcache is young online so not too much user using it, and it seems no > one is doing the benchmark. > but what i can tell u so far is: > i have done some benchmark sometimes ago, most non-stupid-non-dirty > opcode cacher, if it's really doing opcode cacher, can boost php speed > up about 2 times faster, and their benchmark is almost equal, with minor > --- something like 0.01 to 0.1 percent --- difference. > and you can always see the official author claim their cacher is more > faster than anyone's else. +1. I'm trying to benchmark it. Already did it with apc & eAccelerator. http://www.ipersec.com/index.php?q=en/bench_ea_vs_apc The benchmark is recent, but I have some work to update it...
on 24.01.2008 10:18
on 27.02.2008 19:31
Malte Geierhos wrote: > It would be nice to see some performance comparison between eA, APC, > ZendOptimizationSuite and xcache. > > Has anyone done some tests until now ? I've tested using an application containing about 50 php source files total of 78Mb cached. Compared against eAccelerator, xCache provides about the same performance increase. pecl-apc was about 20% slower.
on 13.03.2008 08:48
Jason Read wrote: > Malte Geierhos wrote: >> It would be nice to see some performance comparison between eA, APC, >> ZendOptimizationSuite and xcache. >> >> Has anyone done some tests until now ? > > I've tested using an application containing about 50 php source files > total of 78Mb cached. Compared against eAccelerator, xCache provides > about the same performance increase. pecl-apc was about 20% slower. Excuse me by newbie question but.... How doy you do the test? What kind of programs did you used? I have no ways or I don't know the properly software to count and test the increase of perfomance. If you give me some steps of do bencmark test I'll write a text in my blog speaking about XCache and the difference of load with APC/EA. Promise. And about the test or benchamark, I tested the Xcache in a high server load and works perfectly. The day before we running with APC and we had a lot of troubles: PHP ACCESS VIOLATION, slowness, etc. Bye!
on 14.03.2008 09:21
> Excuse me by newbie question but.... How doy you do the test? What kind > of programs did you used? I have no ways or I don't know the properly > software to count and test the increase of perfomance. > > If you give me some steps of do bencmark test I'll write a text in my > blog speaking about XCache and the difference of load with APC/EA. > Promise. just run some php app (vbulletin, phpmyadmin etc) with XCache enabled first, and then apc/ea etc. you gotta know how to configure each of them and tune it to be as fast as possible while keeping fair (like providing/cutting same set of function) to do the test, run "ab" ("apache bench" tool from apache) or anything else that do mass request to webserver and show how fast the requests is done the faster the better it's easy for newbie to make mistake and produce wrong benchmark result however > > And about the test or benchamark, I tested the Xcache in a high server > load and works perfectly. The day before we running with APC and we had > a lot of troubles: PHP ACCESS VIOLATION, slowness, etc. it's big difference :) but you may want some apc/ea guys help your troubleshooting > > Bye!
